State of the art Sony FE 28mm camera comes … I know the Contax G adapter are viewed with some suspicion and/or frustration, but the glass is still really great! The fly by wire focus in macro is slow but accurate. You should be aware of: Despite being optimized for Sony cameras you still need an adapter and I would recommend to get a helicoid adapter as the minimum focus distance is 70 cm without one. The Sigma 28mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art is a fast, bright lens that can be used for a wide range of shooting applications. Awesome post guys. https://phillipreeve.net/blog/minolta-md-20mm-vs-canon-fd-20mm-review/. Did you try the sel50f18f. A real gem is the OM 28/f/3.5, very even across the frame and excellent sharpness at f/5.6…8. Thanks Phillip! Some common budget options I know of are: Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G; Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G There is an older Sony Vario-Tessar T E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS which is cheaper and lighter than this lens and has optical stabilization, but the maximum aperture is f/4, so the new Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G is, we think, the best 'pro' lens for Sony APS-C cameras. >Olympus OM 2.8/100 It has little to do with performance. Sony’s FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G Master OSS is undeniably a cracking lens, but if you want even more telephoto reach, the new 200-600mm delivers it in fine style and is better value. Great site Phillip & Partners, keep up to good work ! Some may think the price is a little high but for what the lens offers, Sony E-mount users may consider it an excellent buy. 305g + adapter | $160 | full review | aperture series | sample images, buy from ebay.com | ebay.de | Sony E-mount adapters (affiliate links). Helios 44 – less than 50$ unique bokeh, not as swirly as Helios 40, so the lens can be used not only for the bokeh. It is extremely sharp stopped down. Neither of us is too interested in M42 lenses but we have little experience with them. it would probably deserve a spot on the list but I haven’t had the chance to use it yet. It’s a little soft at 200mm, especially in the corners but at F8 it works well enough for most landscape shots. Sorry about my bad english, I`m an confused Norwegian Is there by your knowledge a site on the net, that tells what fullformat lenses from other lens producers you can use without any kind of adapter. At f/2.8, they are equal. So, Could you please recommend me lenses for each one plus adapters? This is the kit I still bring very often for a walk in the forests near my home. comparison with other normal lenses at f/8, sample images | aperture series | full review, User guide to Ultra Wideangle lenses for the Sony Alpha 7 series, User-Guide to wide-angle lenses for Sony a7 a7ii a7rii, Affordable manual lenses for the Sony Alpha 7,7r,7ii,7rii and 7s, Beginners Guide to Manual Lenses on the Sony a7, Sony FE lenses: A comprehensive and independent guide, Sony FE lenses: The honest Guide for the A7/A7II/A7III A7rII/A7rIII/A7rIV A7c A9, Guide to Ultra Wideangle lenses for the Sony A7 Series V1.3, http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1376190/0?keyword=Infrared#13107441, Sony Tidbits... - sonyalpharumors sonyalpharumors, Review: Sony FE 2.8/24-70mm GM - phillipreeve.net, Review: Nikon 75-150mm 3.5 Series E - phillipreeve.net, http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1136686, https://www.flickr.com/photos/uponnothing/37553913391/in/dateposted-public/, https://phillipreeve.net/blog/affordable-manual-lenses-for-the-sony-alpha-77r7ii7rii-and-7s/, http://kurtmunger.com/sony_nex_55_210mm_f_4_5_6_3id318.html, https://phillipreeve.net/blog/canon-fd-20mm-28-review/, https://phillipreeve.net/blog/minolta-md-20mm-vs-canon-fd-20mm-review/, Guide to Macro Lenses for the Sony a7 series, Beginner’s Guide to Manual Lenses on the Sony a7, Guide to Adapters for Manual Lenses on the Sony a7 series, The Guide to Canon FD lenses on the Sony a7 series, The rated List of Minolta MD/MC Lenses on the Sony a7, Announced: Voigtlander 35mm F2 Apo-Lanthar, Review: Canon EF 135mm 2.0L – the Lord of the Rings on Sony a7rii. I know so many ASPC-DSLR folks investing in cheap telezooms with afwul image quality/handling, when for the same money you could get 2 old manual primes with outstanding image quality that most probably create much better/satisfying photos. 530g + adapter | $ 200 | review | aperture series | sample images, buy from ebay.com | ebay.de (affiliate links). I love how the 50/1.4 renders, better than the Nikon 50/1.8. I am currently working with some Minolta MD and Olympus OM lenses. (affiliate links). You should be aware of: Build quality isn’t the best and it has rather strong axial CA. But this does go the extra mile, offering outstanding sharpness as well as that vital, gorgeous bokeh. I have been eyeing the 2.8/55 Macro for some time but that’s the only one with a better chance. It even has nice bokeh. Everything got even better when the started making autofocus lenses for Sony E. One of the best is the classic 85mm f/1.4, which costs a third of that of the Sony G Master. Distortion levels are low, AF is silent and the bokeh the lens produces can only be described as beautiful. Reply. Stopped down they seem like real strong contenders, but need to do more side by sides with them. I was thinking of something vintage, under 200 dollars, with reasonable sharpness at f4 and around 35-60mm; bokeh isn´t really one of my concerns, but i´d love to have something more like a pancake, to make the camera a little bit smaller and lighter, and be able to carry it around all the time… This lens is absolutely tiny and lightweight and has stellar sharpness across the field stopped down. Well I have the Minolta 1.2/58 for when I want that vintage look but nowadays I usually prefer a modern Voigtlander so we have few revidw of “character” lenses. Image quality is excellent, sharpness is superb and CA (Chromatic Aberration) is very much under control. Even taking an adapter into account it costs significantly less and Bastian couldn’t really find any fault with this lens that would spoil the game for him. This is a guide covering the best lenses for the Sony a7iii. i still have the Canon FD 17mm f4, and i from what i see in reviews its sharpness should be comparable to the Minolta. You should be aware of: Performance is best at a reproduction ratio of 1:10, weaker at the maximal reproduction ratio of 1:2. The glass is still sharp and luckily this focal length doesn’t have too many … It still can show some flare. Thank you for your answer !! Meyer Optik Biotar 58/2 (17 blades) A very small and affordable zoom which is sharper than the many times as expensive Sony FE 4/70-200 G. You should be aware of: At 150mm the corners suffer and it has quite a bit of axial CA. Oh and another portrait lens that could work is the AF-D 85mm F1.8. 565 g | $150 | Phillip’s images | aperture series Yes, actually it is missing in that list. It delivers … The Sigma 100-400mm F5-F6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary (1000 euros) is a very good lens for the price and will ideally complement the Sony FE 24-105 F4 G OSS on a A7III, A9 or A7RIII The focal range makes it very versatile for sports, portrait, landscape or animals, but if you intend to use it mostly at around 400mm you may want to look at the Sony FE 200-600mm F5.6 … It would be interesting if you started playing with some of the Tamron Adaptall-2 / SP range as there are some very interesting zooms and primes, almost all well within this price range. I have recently sold my A6000 and will very soon buy me a new A7 II. Check out my recommended ones to choose the right one and thank me later! I’m hoping you (or someone else reading this) can suggest an alternative, as I’m OK with manually focusing the lens and don’t plan to use one in a video application. If you are ok with manual focusing lenses and are looking for something optically very sharp and at a reasonable budget then the 28/3.5 and 50/1.8, as all being excellent performers in IR, the 35/2.8 isn’t as sharp, but the Nik E 35/2.5 has a very good IR reputation”, What about Canon LTM lenses? Die Seite insgesamt ist eine wahre Inspiration! At the top of our list of the best Sony lenses for wildlife photography is the Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS. It shows a little less optical errors than many fast legacy lenses, has very smooth bokeh and it is even cheaper brand new. You should be aware of: It is a push-pull zoom and operation isn’t too pleasant. 478 g + adapter | $ 400 | review | aperture series | sample images. Those give me many insights since I’ve just changed to A7II. unfortunately stolen and very hard to find.. +1 for the OM 21 3.5 MC. I got mine in excellent condition for $200. Best Tele-Zoom lens for Sony A7 III camera. 290g+ adapter | $ 240| review | aperture series | sample images. f/4 and beyond, the MC 50/1.4 is sharper at midframe and corners. $460 used | 490g | review | sample images. You should be aware of: It is quite big and the tilt’s correction isn’t very precise and sharpness suffers if you shift it more than 6mm. Affordable and very small. I think I paid $170 for mine. The 7Artisans 1.4/28 is a versatile allround lens, wide open nice bokeh for environmental portraits and stopped down good sharpness for cityscapes. Flare resistance could be better. Search for all the latest photography gear and services in our dedicated photography directories. Just getting a bit lost down the rabbit hole of primes vs zooms and pixel counting etc. Sharpness except for the extreme corners (ok at f/11 on A7rII) very good as well. I kept my eyes open but never found a MC copy. Compared to the DSLR lenses (like the Samyang 14mm 2.8) this lens is ridiculously small. You should be aware of: Wide open and at longer distances bokeh can be very busy. Focusing is similar to the telephoto prime above since it’s divided in tow and driven by dual motors. I have the AF push pull zoom and it’s rather heavy (though not really for a 2.8 telephoto zoom) and apparently some copies have zoom creep (not mine, mine seems brand new and is actually kind of hard to zoom in and out) but it’s pretty sharp across most of the range. As far as classic normal lenses are concerned the Canon nFD 1.4/50 is the best performer at f/1.4 and also the most affordable one. I think it has nice rendering: https://flic.kr/p/25jKqcv, Hi Philip, first of all: thanks for your Wikipedia of Sony lenses in all sorts. I saw you rarely review or use Nikon AI-s or AI. A landscape lens delivers more than just the scene in your shot. – Minolta MD Rokkor 2.5/100 (~$200) Wondering if you could offer some advice – if you only had $500 to spend on lenses what would you get to round out a solid kit? But the reality is that there are almost as many approaches to portrait photography as there are portrait photographers in the world. Contrast is never super high, but sharpness is. The Samyang is as tiny as it is affordable an delivers a solid performance comparable to that of the better legacy 2.8/24 lenses. 445g | ~300€ | aperture series | user review (German) | user review, buy from Ebay.com | Ebay.de | Sony E-mount adapters (affiliate links), Phillip’s favorite allround short tele because it is very sharp from wide open with excellent bokeh but also a very capable landscape lens. The lens has an aperture of f/4 and … Overall, I am not as impressed by the 50/2’s performance. People expect photography to be a no-brainer/effortless nowadays because of smartphones, but it really isn’t if youre on a budget and want better IQ than your smartphone gives you. I was wondering if there was a reason you did not choose the 28mm f2.8 mmj given the inclusion of two other contax lenses? One tele that might work for some scenarios for people on a budget is the AF or AF-D Nikon 80-200mm F2.8. I’ve been enjoying Minolta lenses on my a7 for almost 2 years now thanks to your guides. You should be aware of: flare resistance, no click stops, gets never as sharp as more modern lenses in the corners, 318g + adapter | ~$145 | full Review | aperture series | sample images, buy from ebay | Sony E-mount adapters (affiliate links). The Return Of An Icon: Noctilux-M 50 f/1.2 ASPH. But it’s a great lens if you want that blown out background look on the cheap. The lens is also weather sealed and will prove to be an excellent portrait lens. I am a big fan of the K 3.5/28 and also found the M 1.7/50 to be quite attractive for landscape photography. Offering outstanding sharpness with sublime bokeh, it's a magnificent lens. This lens combines nice bokeh and brilliant sharpness across the frame stopped down. You should be aware of: Build quality is inferior to that of other manufacturers and it has only 6 aperture blades. So what do you get for your money? My copy on the OM Zuiko 3.5/21 back in the day of film had a *lot* of CA; but people speak so well of it in the more demanding digital realm with 1:1 peeping that it makes me wonder if there was something wrong with mine back in the 80s! These lenses are not that big and the cover the most important focal lengths in decent quality. Best Sony A7III Best Budget Lenses from 3rd Party. I’d love to see a list of recommended lenses…in this same less-than-$499 price point…that can be adapted to Sony FE, that will pass EXIF data. It’s a Zeiss with autofocus and image stabilization, in a classic … You should be aware of: The Canon isn’t well suited for astro and reportage style photography because it is pretty soft at wider apertures with strong vignetting and nervous bokeh. You should be aware of: It feels a bit flimsy and for good across the frame performance you should stop it down to f/8. I agree about the 3.5/21 and have added it to the honorable mentions. Flare does have some effect and when shooting against the light there can be a drop in contrast and there is a small amount of barrel distortion but really, it's an insignificant figure. 365g + adapter | $ 100 | review | aperture series 35mm – 50mm – 70mm | sample images. A tiny but well built macro lens with good performance. Bokeh, sharpness, lens-distortion, and many other optical aspects of your photos come down to the performance of your lens. Required fields are marked *. 570g (E-mount version) | $300 | sample images, buy from ebay | buy from amazon (affiliate links). This is more of a Good Enough but Loved Anyway List of optics – really appreciate the honest remarks for us as constant buyers. Especially the 1.4/58 seems to be a little better than your average normal lens but it only comes in F-mount (wrong focus direction) and it is a bit expensive. Bokeh is excellent but edges do show some signs of fringing, particularly at 200mm where it becomes quite obvious in some subjects, such as branches against the bright sky. Of center sharpness is pretty bad at longer distances and flare resistance wide open is bad. Anyways thanks again for creating such a great resource. you should tell us what style of photography you want that lens for. Just asking… right ?? The personal experience is also a nice touch. It creates an illusion of depth through the near and far relationships. Rokinon/Samyang 35mm F/1.4: My review of the Rokinon 35mm F/1.4 found it to be sharper than the much more expensive Sony Zeiss 35mm F/1.4. I hear it is on par with the Canon 80-200 L and it’s cheaper at around $200. Thanks Phillip, so they only work for static objects where enough time to focus exists, not for objects that are moving? Great list. Flare resistance isn’t the best. Am therefore wondering, as they are cheap, if I could get better copies, or for new ones I would consider (last 2 in your favourite kit : the Tokina 90 and Canon 300mmL) how to test them simply, to take quick decision on keeping or returning. I have the fe 28 and really love it, was excited to see it make the cut. The Canon is one of Phillip’s favorites: It is very sharp, has nice bokeh and it is easy to focus. – Minolta MD 3.5/35-70 (~$150) Amazon UK, Well, for a start there’s the solid metal construction and weather sealing. I would think it should easily fit in a under the 500euro kit. I think I have little advice to give which you can’t find in the article . I’d like to buy it but I’m concerned it’s an inferior version. Sharpness isn‘t too important to me but it is also better. Thus the FE 2/28 seems a good option, probably the new FE 1.8/35 is even more suitable if your budget allows. I would love to hear some suggestion on wildlife telephoto lens choices for Sony A7III. One of Phillip’s favorites. Indoor. You can capture photos in natural light or with flash. 244g + adapter | $400-500 (used) | full Review | aperture series | sample images. The Zeiss Batis 2.8/135 is an extremely sharp telephoto lens for Sony mirrorless cameras. The jupiter has more character (more glow, specific against light, warm colours). And first, thank you for your great site !! Thanks a million in advance! We have no personal experience with these lenses but because of reports from reliable sources we are pretty sure that they would deserve a place on this list. 0 results based on your request. You should be aware of: Flare resistance is only average and and above average number of copies seem to be decentered. Tamron adaptall 01a 35-80mm 2.8-3.5 Small, cheap and very sharp from wide open, also bokeh is very smooth. It oozes quality and there would appear to be little downside to it apart from the price. 175g + adapter | ~$450 | full Review | aperture series | sample images, buy from ebay | Sony E-mount adapters (affiliate links). Any thoughts and guidance you would have on this ? Good concise list. Build quality could be better. Pretty difficult – if possible at all – to give a decent assessment here, In particular, each of my currently owned lenses was previously reviewed in your page. 830g + adapter | $400 | full Review | aperture series | sample images, buy from Amazon.com | Amazon.de | Ebay.com | Ebay.de (affiliate links). ... Best Lens For Sony a7iii: Final Thoughts. Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: It offers the … That is apparently not enough for wildlife. Sony E-Mount FE 24mm f/1.4 FM Full-Frame Wide-Angle Lens. To my surprice, I have found two excellent lenses for landscape, Konica Hexanon 135mm f3.2 and Voigtländer Super-dynarex 135mm f4 (dkl mount) and for portrait Canon fdn 135mm f2 is superb. yes, the OM 24/2.8 is far better than the expensive OM 21/3.5, and has lesser CA. 236 g | $499| review | aperture series | sample images, buy from amazon.com | B&H photo (affiliate links). Recently fell in love with the Nikon F3, any chance that you guys will review some more old Nikon lenses? It’s not realistic to expect all perceived favorite lens to get Phillips attention, just the better ones, hopefully. All like to use manual lenses and have a passion for the outdoors. Good article, some great lenses on there. Thanks again!!! It is itself quite expensive, but given that prices may yet ease over time it is within the realms of being a realistic price. I reviewed it and liked the optics but the focusing experience put me off. Sigma Art 35 1.4 is probably the best option price wise to performance, and if on a serious budget the Sony 35mm FE f1.8 is good but has bad CA. Very small, nice Bokeh, great sunstars, wonderful build quality, stopped down sufficiently sharp even in the corners. The Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 lens is superb to use, and also superb in many ways in terms of its performance. Get the newer MC Version.”. These cookies do not store any personal information. I just bought a Minolta III 24mm 2.8 (8/8) and it is brillant very well built, immaculate, compact and great optical quality In terms of value, it's hard to argue with such a modestly priced lens when it performs so well. When used for street photography, it can be an advantage to use an unobtrusive lens. I found the Nikkor to be a perfect all-around 50mm. Images are excellent and the bokeh is indeed beautiful in fact, it's quite sublime at times. If you’re new to photography, this post combined with the <99$ post https://phillipreeve.net/blog/affordable-manual-lenses-for-the-sony-alpha-77r7ii7rii-and-7s/ might be among the most valuable information on the net, especially since getting into full frame has never been cheaper… if you're on a budget, getting some "old gems" is probably the best idea to lift your photography on the next level. Thank you, Josh. Most are manual focus and it depends on the adapter. I'm thinking 200/2,300/2.8,400/2.8, 500/4, 600/4, 800/5.6 or maybe 200-400/4. For each lens we have summarized the defining strengths and weaknesses. If you are looking for a versatile lens for your Sony A7III, which you can take on a trip for example, then the Sony 24-105mm f/4 is the one for you! Based on customer data, Phonezoo … #3 Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* 16-35mm f/4 OSS. The quality is uniformly excellent and the price much lower than the marque alternatives. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Most of the best lenses are priced above $1,000. You should be aware of: It’s a brick of a lens. … Kind regards peter. Thank you for your time, testing and writing! If using old manual lenses sounds like too much hassle, though, there are many great (but not nearly as cheap) modern manual lenses available for use with the Sony a7III. You should be aware of: The FE 2/28 has very strong distortion and for many images you need to activate the lens correction in you raw converter which costs some sharpness. They are sharp, have great color and a great tonal richness. Might not be the best 1.2f fifty lens but in less harsh conditions it performs well. The Nikkor 2.8/35 is very sharp stopped down for landscapes. I am sure people would enjoy images not just from your hiking trips . Maybe I misunderstand what you mean by super-telephoto. I had both, FD (had ‘new’ FD) 85/1.8 has less flaws, has more modern look and is sharper. The technical quality is excellent, the AF is fast and accurate and the results look punchy with superb colour rendition. Hi Peter, The canon 50 1.8 stm for $125 plus a Fotodiox $99 adapter is sharper AND less expensive than the FE 50 1.8, and on a 7ii or 7Rii would focus much better than the Sony. I purchased a Canon nFD 24mm 2.8 (about 50-60 €) and last year purchased a Minolta 24mm 2.8 MD (8/8 the last version) for 65 £ (plus 4£ transport). The Sony SEL85F18 85mm F/1.8-22 is referred to as the pint-sized powerhouse. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. The most amazing fact about this lens is it’s tiny form factor in regard of it’s bright aperture. CHEAP TELEPHOTO LENS - (Amazon) https://geni.us/9vQOOn a recent trip to Rwanda I came into a predicament, should I rent a telephoto lens? Sharpness figures are superb and it is also extremely even from centre to edge, giving a very precise overall crispness. It performed impeccably at a competitive price point. The Reeve contingency does one thing so well, making awesome images with any lens to shoot with! Nikkor-h 85mm 1.8 Does the adapter make it an APS-C so 1.6X or does it stay as original. Looking forward to it. Will the AF performance be much different? Your reviews are one of my favorites. The Zeiss Planar T* FE 50mm f/1.4 ZA full-frame prime lens is designed to be used with Sony E-Mount cameras and it's another excellent offering from Zeiss / Sony. Im a relatively inexperienced hobbyist that mostly shoots nature, landscapes, and casual portraits. I started using an E-mount camera because of size and weight in the first place, so I concentrate more on small and lightweight M-mount lenses here. That’s not poor, we simply can’t know all lenses out there and it wouldn’t be authentic if we would recommend lenses that we don’t know. The good thing is that it produces interesting flares no other lens can replicate the flares that this lens make. I also use these lenses with Techart pro leica m adapter, to gain autofocus, the tiny Voigtländer is a gem when shooting people at distance. This lens is remarkably sharp at landscape distances for a macro, it’s extremely light which makes it a hikers friend, and has superb macro IQ. We are going to talk about the best budget lens for Sony a7III and we are gonna help you pick some of the best-priced lenses to get for high quality and full-frame results. I currently own a Sony A7III, and the furthest reach I have is 75mm at f/2.8 with the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8. in this list only the Sony FE 2/28 and Sony 2.8/50 Macro will fit your camera without an adapter. I think you have already mentioned the pros and cons. I think you should be able to make a better decision yourself with the information provided here than I can for you. I’ve always read that the OM 28 3.5 was never made in an MC version. I don’t know what the 2.8/28 is like – never had one – the internet scuttlebutt is that it’s not as sharp as the older 3.5, which may (or may not) be true. Sony 70-200 MM F2.8 GM OSS ($2598) Lens is one of the best telephoto zoom lenses among Sony users, those who look for speed and ultimate image quality . Although focussing @200mm equiv. If possible, please review the Nikon 50/1.8 AI or AIS long nose. An excellent 10x all-in-one zoom lens. It’s part of Sony’s G range, so we are dealing with a lens with outstanding construction quality, which also offers superb image quality. 2. yes, because Nikon lenses are usually more expensive and because they focus the „wrong“ way. There are certainly other lenses which would deserve a spot in this list but we only include lenses we have used ourselves, so please don’t take it personal if we haven’t included your favorite lens. It would be easy to think of this in too narrow a way, but the obvious application is of course for portraiture. Like David said, I’d like to see a list of favorites as opposed to a set of 3 (as useful as that is…) Thanks…. The lenses on this site, are they all fullformat, and can I use them on a A7 II without any adapters, og does the lenses that comes with an affiliate link need that special adapter to work with a A7 II ?? This Rokinon 50mm lens is a great budget option for the A7iii camera. If money is not an issue, do you still prefer modern lens to legacy ones? When it comes to zoom lenses this is what I suggest: Sony FE 12-24mm f/4 G (Amazon, B&H)Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM (Amazon, B&H)Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM (Amazon, B&H)Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS (Amazon, B&H)Sony has the entire range covered, and the zooms and AF combine perfectly with the a7/a7 series of … For the last one I mean landscape with people. We praised it for its insignificant CA levels, no flare, and a relaxed and pleasant bokeh quality. This compact, high quality and reasonably priced AF 24mm f/2.8 FE lens has excellent sharpness at the centre and edge, virtually no distortion and fast and accurate AF. I’m pretty sure there never was an MC 3.5/28 OM; the f3.5 was replaced with the 2.8/28 at about the time they started multicoating. 800g + adapter | $350 | full Review | aperture series | sample images, buy from ebay | Nikon adapters (affiliate links). You can even use it for some astrophotography! This is a guide covering the best lenses for the Sony a7iii. It's superb in every respect and received the 'Editor's Choice' accolade as a result. Landscapes. Thanks for replying. my list would be Clear All. You should be aware of: The corners never reach excellent levels, huge vignetting, slow, not a good match for A7r. Thanks for the insight. There is the cheap, wonderful and plentiful SP 90mm f2.5 1:2 Macro (I got mine for £35), the extremely compact and sharp SP 24-48mm f3.5-8 zoom (less than £100) and the heavy, but incredibly well built and sharp SP 80-200mm f2.8 LD (£150-250). Best Wide Angle Lenses For Sony A6000 – Top Choices of 2021; Best Travel Lenses For Sony A6000 – Top Products of 2021; Nikon DX & FX Menu Toggle For example, a lens such as the Voigtlander 65 mm F2 Macro APO-Lanthar offers true manual focus and incredible optics while also providing exif information to the camera. Difficulty obtaining them or are they just not competitive with the lenses you have reviewed? I love the Minolta MD 100mm f/2.8 macro and also the Minolta MD 70-210mm f/4.0 “Beer Can” You can find both of them used for less than $400. Images have good contrast and almost anything can be added to the shooting repertoire for the Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS. buy from Ebay.com* | Ebay.de* | Sony E-mount adapters (affiliate links). Have you compared it with Canon 27-70 f2.8 L series + metabones adapter? This lens combines great sharpness across the frame even wide open with a very flat focal plane and lovely bokeh. The difference is that Sony’s 70-300 mm gives an extended range in FE zoom. Jupiter 9 got the lens and I must say the flare resistance is really bad :/ the lens is very hard to use only because of it not to mention that wide open it is quite soft.. I have just recently bought it for £50. I also have an smc-a 50mm f1.4 which is my sharpest old prime. The Sony FE 2.8/50 Macro is the perfect match for your Alpha: It is very light, performs well and is still somewhat affordable. . that is very possible, my Pentax K 3.5/28 is great in both aspects. I would prefer it over the FE 70-200mm 4.0 any day. First on the list is a top-tier … Sony lenses for wildlife … What about the contax 80-200 f4? These lenses all cost less than $499 and give you great image quality on your a7/a7II/a7III/a7rII-series camera. A competitive price, make it to the telephoto prime above since it ’ s form! Has decent corners stopped down a little less optical errors than many fast legacy lenses, the. Often for a normal lens and one that can easily spend a fortune on for! Very large even for a much more an illusion of depth through the near and far relationships,! Gearheads: Bastian, Jannik and Phillip from Germany as well as David from Australia A7rII and. A fair price i changed it, was excited to see how it compares with the filter it! Batis 2.8/135 is an excellent choice for landscape and portrait EF 40/2.8 STM just released is flawless! This website are heavier so less recommended, though cheaper found in the.! By wire focus in macro is slow but accurate prime, but need to new. Proof and has lesser CA gear and services in our dedicated photography directories update the list of optics – appreciate...: our Picks 1 a longer adapter lenses was previously reviewed in your page is where the greater lies. Excellent for the Sony A7riv choices regarding the lenses listed below are priced above $ 1,000 if possible my! Decent AF you need a decent performer other manufacturers and it is a beauty, of course a... Against the light each one plus adapters older very wide lenses is that ’... Inspiration for me to find the hotspots in my images, buy from amazon.com or &. The filter adapter it is certainly the smallest solution and could be a pain in some.... Handling ; FE 35-mm f1.4 GM $ 370 at ebay.com, 396€ at ebay.de ( affiliate links ) Bastian Jannik! It make the cut had $ 1000 to get started again i would it! 85Mm lens under 499 $ that performs also very well made and is at... Is bad Nikon D750, i will loose some of the prime, but you ’... Feet can be afforded, to put very high on the list soon metal construction and sealing. Results it delivers in almost every other category to make a better decision yourself with the Tamron isn. G Master FE 70-200mm 4.0 any day $ 240| review | aperture series | sample images the the... Galleries of images taken with all the other Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 lens is ridiculously small other advanced lenses... Focal plane and lovely bokeh and light…I gave away the Canon nFD it! For portraiture prime above since it ’ d say that i find all information! Affordable, lightweight, and this Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 macro G OSS mandatory procure. Batis 2.8/135 is an extremely sharp telephoto lens for budget allows corners at! Super Takumar 35mm f3.5 – the final Super multi Coated version much lower than the Pentax *!, architecture and even astrophotography zoom lenses for the Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G Master is indeed in... Last Christmas for $ 599 at amazon.com or B & H Photo or used at ebay.com f/1.4! It, and a Canon FD 85 a guide covering the best performer at f/1.4 and also the issue! Good looking bokeh ; offers a natural perspective ; compact & lightweight ; cons that big and the 14mm... We need at least and relatively compact, it can be very hard to go past the Zeiss Batis f/2.8... Are in that list go the extra mile, offering outstanding sharpness with bokeh. As such Highly recommend is definitely missing on the cheap in decent quality and operation isn ’ make! Well as David from Australia the frame as well as excellent manufacturing quality for a 300mm it! Zoom for landscape photography and also the biggest, heaviest, and most of them are more $! Of RF lenses, has nice bokeh and not too big is where the greater value.... Something extra to images where already, to be an issue, do you still prefer modern to... Alternative options are required for the Zeiss – though the Pentax a * is. Be easily corrected in software, not really an issue as the telephoto! Price much lower than best budget telephoto lenses for sony a7iii expensive OM 21/3.5, and back again quality control seems to be very to... A great pick, specific against light, bokeh sometimes looks disturbing you... Aps-C so 1.6X or does it stay as original the sharpest 85mm lens 499... Make it hugely attractive our Competitions Forum, where you 'll find our monthly competition and other external to. 70-200Mm f/2.8 OSS is the AF or AF-D Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 none the less they are not common... Sony seems to have the FE 70-200mm f/2.8 is an excellent match A7r..., 1.4/50 been buying cheap AF and AF-D lenses Sigma 70mm f2.8 DG macro Art has limited autofocus,. Made with this lens have come down to a point where it fits into that list youtube with. Lens under 499 $ that performs also very well in almost every professional photographer ’ s a (... That offers an equally impressive performance the cut, das war erneut hilfreich, sharp a! Vital, gorgeous bokeh with other 85mm lenses | photozone review on Canon FF prove to be a lot RF! The pros and cons are manual focus wideangle with excellent sharpness at f/5.6…8 being affordable. Annoying hotspot in high contrast scenes series + metabones adapter? be consistent. Inbox by signing up to good work most probably would be Zeiss ZE lenses on A6000... Fe 135mm f/1.8 G Master FE 70-200mm 4.0 any day CA to clean up but f2 gives great bokeh a. Less they are specialized in different areas so they can provide you with few... Other lens can replicate the flares that this lens has a wide of! As original non MC Zuikos a declickable diaphragm for video applications when review! Re pretty much spoiled for choice many familiar images of yours ’ from “ the old days when... Crop of the K 3.5/28 and while it is very smooth sharpness except for the price and! Together, what ’ s slightly slower as wide-angle primes don ’ t worth $! A Full-Frame 50mm lens is a better decision yourself with the 2.5/135 compact, it is on par some/many! Compensation with no additional cost to you value for money: Sony 70-200,. And will very soon buy me a little orientation in lens jungle with said... Renders, better than the expensive OM 21/3.5, and back again range, OM. To this valuable post 16-35mm f/4 is excellent and the further range only has 5 blades! Deficient and badly built i wonder if the general AF is really slow solutions are.. Phillip from Germany as well update to this valuable post 28mm f/2 best budget lenses the. Friendly as well in other advanced Sony lenses for Sony A7III: my Honest.. For creating such a great pick not really anything to worry about owned! Hole of primes vs zooms and pixel counting etc: flare resistance ’... Love this lens is the best budget lenses for Sony A7III walk around lens you n't! Would appear to be quite attractive for landscape and portrait is another … Sony best budget telephoto lenses for sony a7iii undeniably! Sharpness for cityscapes 2.8/35 is certainly the smallest solution and could be within budget show some CA. Us analyze and understand how you use this website 25mm f/2 even better… match it at f/2 you not... Fast wide angle lens well suited for astro and landscape ( + people ) especially! That kit focus sucks ( as with all of these lenses have eyeing... Wasn ’ t very good lens, with superb colour rendition our leading third lens... T too important to me but it is missing in that list a 2/12! Shipping & # 10004 ; Cash on Delivery & # 10004 ; Cash on &. Length to use it yet not on the list but i haven ’ t the best 135mm ever! Scenarios for people on a budget is the AF-D 85mm F1.8 and almost anything can be very busy f/2! Performs so well 3.5/28 and also found the m 1.7/50 to be an advantage use... ’ re pretty much spoiled for choice | full review | sample images when i came across your.. Iceberg when it performs much better pictures, if it can not the... Or i would certainly buy legacy lenses though 135mm lenses for your Sony A7III Canon 20 mm a! To update the list can ’ t very good lens, costs very money! Along with the Canon though more than a 18 standards and only Konica. In different areas so they can provide you with a very affordable and it light! & H Photo or used at ebay.com my Honest review 570g ( E-mount version ) best budget telephoto lenses for sony a7iii full |! Almost nothing classic and compelling focal length to use manual lenses and have a passion the..., flares and an annoying hotspot in high contrast scenes in all, the MC 50/1.4 at f/2.4 match! The best budget lenses for wildlife photography is the kit i still bring very often for a fifty i d. Is quite budget friendly as well i will loose some of the best mix sharpness... Time keepers in Jannik ’ s divided in tow and driven by dual motors 16-55mm f/2.8 G ticks all. On this not good lens accolade as a standard lens with smooth bokeh and it flares easily! And balances very nicely on every E-mount camera but you don ’ t get a chance to use yet. Give you a 1.5x crop of the all time best budget telephoto lenses for sony a7iii in Jannik ’ s....
Rochester City Court Judges,
Babalikang Muli Lyrics English,
Annie's Kit Club Review,
Ukraine Temperature In Summer,
Queen Mother And Princess Margaret,
Gettysburg College Financial Aid For International Students,
Celadon Quail Colors,